$ git diff main -- vs/greptile-vs-claude-code-review.md
commit a1b2c3d - author: Oliver Wakefield-Smith - verified 21 Jun 2026
Greptile ($30/seatsrc) bundles tokens and indexes your monorepo. Claude Code Review ($100/seat + token metersrc) is the Anthropic-native surface, GitHub-only at launch. Greptile wins on $/seat; Claude wins on raw reasoning depth per PR.
@@ 10-dev burn (50 PRs/wk, 250 LOC/PR) @@napkin
1
toolseatstokensmonthly
Greptile$300bundled$300
Claude Code Review$1,000~$5.50~$1,006
2Greptile is 3.3x cheaper at 10 devs. The gap narrows as PR volume rises into overage; Claude scales linearly with PR LOC instead.
@@ reasoning depth @@qualitative
1+Claude: longer chain-of-thought per PR, better at multi-step reasoning over a single file
2+Greptile: stronger at "this function exists three other places in the monorepo, here is the canonical one"
@@ rollout to 200 devs @@enterprise
1Greptile $/mo @ 200 devs: $6,000 (assuming included bucket holds). Claude $/mo @ 200 devs: $20,000 + tokens.
2-At 200 devs Claude becomes a budget conversation, not a tooling conversation. BYOK Claude via Qodo or Bito may undercut both.
@@ when BYOK Claude beats Greptile managed @@downstream
1At 10 devs Greptile managed = $300/mo. BYOK Claude needs PRs > ~12,000/mo at 250 LOC/PR to undercut. See /byok-breakeven.
@@ cross-links @@related
1/tool/greptile
2/tool/claude-code-review
3/byok-breakeven